• LOGIN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • FREE E-Newsletter/Product Bulletins

Cath Lab Digest

  • Follow us on
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Privacy Policy/Copyright
    • About VDM
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archives
  • Editor's Update
  • Advertise
  • Reprints
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Portal
  • Reviewers
  • Contact

Search

Dethrombosis of the Lower Extremities: Pharmacologic and Mechanical Techniques

  • Fri, 9/5/08 - 3:36pm
  • 0 Comments
  • 3549 reads
Author(s): 

Nicolas W. Shammas, MD, MS

Introduction
Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) is thrombogenic.1 There is a high frequency of elderly patients, diabetics, hyperlipidemics and smokers, conditions associated with hypercoagulation, in patients presenting with PVD. In addition, patients with PVD have a heightened inflammatory state, leading to plaque rupture and subsequent acute and subacute thrombosis and embolization, a mechanism similarly seen in unstable coronary syndromes. Furthermore, patients with PVD have a higher incidence of coexistent coronary disease, myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure and arrhythmias, conditions associated with thrombo-embolism. Finally, occlusions in the peripheral vasculature are likely to contain atherothrombus, usually multilayered acute and/or subacute.

The angiographic presence of thrombus depends on the acuity of the presentation. For instance, fresh thrombus is the hallmark of acute limb ischemia (ALI), present in 100% of these patients. In a recent study, thrombus was present in 16.7% of a PVD population, with 34.4% of these patients having had a recent onset of symptoms.2 In contrast, only 3% of patients had angiographic thrombus in an elective population undergoing renal, iliac and femoral percutaneous interventions, with long occlusions excluded.3 Despite these differences, angiography considerably underestimates the true presence of thrombus, particularly in patients with chronic occlusions.

The presence of thrombus in the peripheral vasculature is associated with multiple complications, including amputation, death, higher re-occlusion rates, urgent/ emergent surgical revascularization, embolization, longer procedure times (Figure 1), prolonged hospitalization, and the need for the use of a high level of anticoagulation, generally associated with increase in major bleeding. Effective and safe treatment of thrombus is therefore of critical importance to reduce complications during peripheral percutaneous interventions (PPI).

The approach to treating thrombotic lower arterial disease depends considerably on the acuity of the presentation. Generally patients are divided into three categories:

1. Acute Presentation. This generally occurs within hours of presentation and is associated with rest limb pain and a pulseless foot. The vessel is typically occluded with a thrombus that has occurred on top of mild to severe lesions.

Collaterals are generally minimal or none. The mechanism of acute thrombosis is mostly plaque rupture followed by in-situ thrombosis or migration of a clot distally. In addition, and not infrequently, embolization of a proximal thrombus in patients with MI, arrhythmias and congestive heart failure is seen. Thrombi in these patients tend to be fresh, and an emergent intervention is needed to salvage the limb. This presentation is referred to as acute critical limb ischemia (ALI).

2. Subacute Presentation. This generally occurs within days to a month. The patient typically presents with accelerated limb pain, with minimal activity or at rest. The underlying lesions are usually severe. A high frequency of total occlusions is seen. Typically patients have collaterals, but not enough to sustain adequate lower extremity circulation at rest or with minimal activity. In subacute presentations, there is a high likelihood that a recent thrombus is present, probably organized, and likely overlying additional subacute and chronic thrombus. The presentation of these patients is analogous to unstable coronary syndromes. Patients typically have limb pain with minimal activity [Rutherford-Baker classification (R-B) III], or at rest such as in critical chronic limb ischemia (CLI).

3. Chronic Presentation. This generally occurs within several months to years. The presentation is typically moderate to severe claudication (R-B II and III). In this population, underlying chronic occlusions can occur in about a third of patients. Collaterals are well-developed but remain suboptimal to keep the patient symptom-free. The presence of angiographic thrombus in this patient population is low, but it is our experience that organized thrombus is likely to be present in the majority of chronic occlusions. These patients are analogous to stable angina patients.

As noted, the clinical presentation of the patient is a substantial factor that influences lower extremity thrombus treatment and will affect the technique and anticoagulant of choice periprocedurally. The anticoagulant should be able to prevent further platelet and thrombin activation, reduce macro/micro thrombus downstream, be very effective in penetrating and dissolving existing thrombus, have lower reocclusion rates and be associated with low bleeding complications. Techniques utilized need to effectively restore flow, minimize procedure length, dissolve thrombus in association with the anticoagulant, reduce embolization downstream and have favorable long-term results.

Taking all of the above factors in consideration, we suggest the following algorithms for the treatment of patients with thrombotic lesions. We understand that more research is needed to validate these recommendations, which are based on the best currently available data.

References: 

1. Shammas NW, Dippel EJ. Evidence-based management of peripheral vascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2005;7:358–363.
2. Shammas NW, Lemke JH, Dippel EJ, et al. In-hospital complications of peripheral vascular interventions using unfractionated heparin as the primary anticoagulant. J Invasive Cardiol 2003;15:242–246.
3. Allie DE, Hall P, Shammas NW, et al. The Angiomax Peripheral Procedure Registry of Vascular Events Trial (APPROVE): In-hospital and 30-day results. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16:651–656.
4. Shammas NW, Dippel EJ, Lemke JH, et al. Eptifibatide in peripheral vascular interventions: results of the Integrilin Reduces Inflammation in Peripheral Vascular Interventions (INFLAME) trial. J Invasive Cardiol 2006;18:6–12.
5. Lincoff AM, Bittl JA, Kleiman NS, et al; REPLACE-1 Investigators. Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (the Randomized Evaluation of PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events [REPLACE]-1 trial). Am J Cardiol 2004;93:1092–1096.
6. Shammas NW, Allie D, Hall P, et al; APPROVE Investigators. Predictors of in-hospital and 30-day complications of peripheral vascular interventions using bivalirudin as the primary anticoagulant: Results from the APPROVE Registry. J Invasive Cardiol 2005;17:356–359.
7. French JK, Edmond JJ, Gao W, et al. Adjunctive use of direct thrombin inhibitors in patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2004;4:107–115.
8. Shammas NW. Complications in peripheral vascular interventions: Emerging role of direct thrombin inhibitors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005;16:165–171.
9. Allie DE, Lirtzman MD, Wyatt CH, et al. Bivalirudin as a foundation anticoagulant in peripheral vascular disease: A safe and feasible alternative for renal and iliac interventions. J Invasive Cardiol 2003;15:334–342.
10. Shammas NW, Lemke JH, Dippel EJ, McKinney DE, et al. Bivalirudin in peripheral vascular interventions: A single center experience. J Invasive Cardiol 2003;15:401–404.
11. Ouriel K, Shortell CK, DeWeese JA, et al. A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with operative revascularization in the initial treatment of acute peripheral arterial ischemia. J Vasc Surg 1994;19:1021–1030.
12. Ouriel K, Veith FJ, Sasahara AA. Thrombolysis or peripheral arterial surgery: Phase I results. TOPAS Investigators. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:64–73.
13. Weaver FA, Comerota AJ, Youngblood M, et al. Surgical revascularization versus thrombolysis for nonembolic lower extremity native artery occlusions: Results of a prospective randomized trial. The STILE Investigators. Surgery versus Thrombolysis for Ischemia of the Lower Extremity. J Vasc Surg 1996;24:513–521.
14. Ansel GM, George BS, Botti CF, et al. Rheolytic thrombectomy in the management of limb ischemia: 30-day results from a multicenter registry. J Endovasc Ther 2002;9:395–402.
15. Allie DE, Hebert CJ, Lirtzman MD, et al. Novel simultaneous combination chemical thrombolysis/rheolytic thrombectomy therapy for acute critical limb ischemia: The power-pulse spray technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:512–522.
16. Allie DE, Hebert CJ, Lirtzman MD, et al. A safety and feasibility report of combined direct thrombin and GP IIb/IIIa inhibition with bivalirudin and tirofiban in peripheral vascular disease intervention: Treating critical limb ischemia like acute coronary syndrome. J Invasive Cardiol 2005;17:427–432.
17. Duda SH, Tepe G, Luz O, et al. Peripheral artery occlusion: Treatment with abciximab plus urokinase versus with urokinase alone — A randomized pilot trial (the PROMPT Study). Platelet Receptor Antibodies in Order to Manage Peripheral Artery Thrombosis. Radiology 2001;221:689–696.
18. Allie DE, Hebert CJ, Lirtzman MD, et al. Continuous tenecteplase infusion combined with peri/postprocedural platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in peripheral arterial thrombolysis: Initial safety and feasibility experience. J Endovasc Ther 2004;11:427–435.
19. Laird JR, Zeller T, Gray BH, et al; LACI Investigators. Limb salvage following laser-assisted angioplasty for critical limb ischemia: Results of the LACI multicenter trial. J Endovasc Ther 2006;13:1–11.
20. Kandzari DE, Kiesz RS, Allie D, et al. Procedural and clinical outcomes with catheter-based plaque excision in critical limb ischemia. J Endovasc Ther 2006;13:12–22.
21. Suri R, Wholey MH, Postoak D, et al. Distal embolic protection during femoropopliteal atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:417–422.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • next ›
  • last »
image description image description

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

  • Advertise your Job Here
    For information on posting classified ads, please contact:
    Alex Dulnikowski, Classified Sales Manager
    (800) 237-7285, ext. 205

vdm Blogs

A New Algorithm to Treat Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease

Robert S. Dieter MD RVT and Aravinda Nanjundappa MD RVT

In-Stent Restenosis in the SFA Remains a Significant Unresolved Problem

Frank J Criado MD FACS FSVM

Support Comes From Many Directions

Richard R. Heuser MD FACC FACP FESC FSCAI

Pedal Artery Access: Advances in Management of Critical limb ischemia

Robert S. Dieter MD RVT and Aravinda Nanjundappa MD RVT

The SFA School of Thought Continues

Lawrence A. Garcia MD
more »

Vascular Newswire

  • Vascular Solutions Launches Reprocessing Service For Closurefast Vein Catheters
    Fri, 02/03/12 - 1:14pm
  • AMA: Halt Implementation of ICD-10
    Thu, 02/02/12 - 11:56am
  • NHS Makes GBP200 Non-Drug Hypertension Treatment Device Available on Prescription
    Wed, 02/01/12 - 11:06am
  • AngioDynamics to Acquire Navilyst Medical
    Tue, 01/31/12 - 2:48pm
more »

Clinical Events Calendar

  • American Venous Forum 24th Annual Meeting
    Wed, 02/08/2012 - Sat, 02/11/2012
    Orlando, FL, United States
  • JIM 2012
    Thu, 02/09/2012 - Sat, 02/11/2012
    Rome, Italy
  • Cardiovascular Care Update 2012 (CVC)
    Fri, 02/10/2012 - Sat, 02/11/2012
    Scottsdale, AZ, United States
more »

Poll

Do you think that endostaples will soon become important tools in the hands of aortic interventionists?:
REVIEW OUR OTHER Cardiology BRANDS

Our other resources for healthcare professionals.

HMP Communications © 2012 HMP Communications

HMP Communications LLC (HMP) is the authoritative source for comprehensive information and education servicing healthcare professionals. HMP’s products include peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed medical journals, national tradeshows and conferences, online programs and customized clinical programs. HMP is a wholly owned subsidiary of HMP Communications Holdings LLC. ©2012 HMP Communications