Combined Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa and Direct Thrombin Inhibition with Eptifibatide and Bivalirudin in the Interventional Treatment
- Fri, 9/5/08 - 3:36pm
- 0 Comments
- 4061 reads
David E. Allie, MD, Chris J. Hebert, RT(R), R-CIS, Mitchell D. Lirtzman, MD, Charles H. Wyatt, MD, V. Antoine Keller, MD, Michael W. McElderry, MD, Raghotham Patlola, MD, Elena V. Mitran, MD, PhD, Craig M. Walker, MD
Introduction
It has been suggested that treatment strategies for acute and chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI) can be tailored, analogous to treating chronic, and especially, acute coronary syndromes (ACS).1,2 Mechanical thrombectomy devices, distal protection devices, excimer laser and drug-eluting stents are just a few examples of device technologies first applied in coronary artery disease and ACS that are now increasingly being utilized in the treatment of CLI. Substantial clinical evidence showing improved outcomes exists, supporting the use of novel antiplatelet and antithrombin strategies utilizing glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibition and direct thrombin inhibition (DTI) in treating ACS and during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).3–6 These results prompted the ACC/AHA 2002 guidelines to recommend the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with ACS undergoing PCI.7 Unfortunately, sparse data exist detailing similar “endopharmacotherapies” in treating peripheral arterial disease (PAD) patients, especially in those requiring percutaneous peripheral interventional (PPI) treatment of CLI.
It is estimated that one out of every four patients with DM will face CLI in their lifetime, and that a diabetic patient is 7 to 40 times more likely to suffer an amputation than the nondiabetic patient.8,9 Similarly, patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) are at higher risk of CLI and amputations, and the incidence of both DM and CRI is significantly higher (2 to 3 times) in the CLI versus the PCI population.1,4,5,10–12 It is now known that PAD, DM and CRI are individually and cumulatively associated with hypercoagulability, inflammation, prothrombotic states, increased thrombin generation, platelet dysfunction, and even unfractionated heparin (UFH) and aspirin (ASA) resistance.13–19 These factors are likely responsible for the higher level of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications during PPI versus PCI, underscoring the need for optimization of antiplatelet and antithrombin strategies in treating CLI.13–15
GP IIb/IIIa and DTI agents, when used individually or in combination, have demonstrated ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes benefits in PCI.3–6,20 Multiple large PCI trials have shown GP IIb/IIIa inhibition to have improved outcomes in patients with ACS, DM, CRI, small vessels, complex anatomy, visible thrombus and acute and subacute stent outcomes, with the DM subsets deriving the greatest benefits.20–24 The potential for GP IIb/IIIa inhibition to decrease platelet aggregation, therefore minimizing the impact and the role of distal microembolization in CLI patients, is particularly attractive in this clinical setting with already-established, severe, outflow infrapopliteal disease and critically low pedal blood flow.1 Three recent reports describing macroembolization, retrieved by distal protection devices during lower extremity PPI, further suggest that an “upstream” GP IIb/IIIa platelet inhibition strategy has the potential to improve ischemic or thrombotic outcomes.25–27 Similarly, DTI with bivalirudin (Angiomax, The Medicines Company, Parsippany, New Jersey) has shown hemorrhagic outcome benefit in PCI. The safety and feasibility in PPI was reported in the multicenter Angiomax Peripheral Procedure Registry of Vascular Events (APPROVE) trial, further strengthening the evidence that a simultaneous combination of DTI and GP IIb/IIIa inhibition may hold promise to improve overall outcomes in CLI patients undergoing PPI.28
It is estimated that CLI is responsible for 220,000–240,000 amputations yearly in the United States and Europe, with an annual cost of $10–20 billion in the United States alone.6,8,9 The 30-day periprocedural mortality and morbidity rates after an amputation are 4–30% and 20–37%, respectively, with less than 50% ever achieving full mobility.29–39 The overall 1-year mortality rate after an amputation is 20–30%, with a 3-year mortality rate of >50–60%.32–38 Any treatment strategy designed to improve the clinical outcomes of CLI would potentially offer significant clinical and economic benefits. It is estimated that just a 25% reduction of amputations could save $2.9–3.0 billion yearly in U.S. healthcare costs alone.8,32 Therefore, the staggering clinical and economic impact of CLI must be taken into consideration when criticizing the incremental costs of adding new “endopharmaceutical” treatment strategies in managing the challenging clinical scenario of CLI.
Significant data exist that implicate a major role for inflammation in cardiovascular diseases and now PAD.16,39–41 Recent data suggest that GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors also possess significant anti-inflammatory properties and may have potential clinical benefits during PPI.42,43 Shammas et al recently published similar results, investigating the role of GP IIb/IIIa inhibition and inflammation in decreasing the vascular inflammation response during PPI in the Integrilin (Schering-Plough Corporation, Kenilworth, New Jersey) reduces inflammatory responses in patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (INFLAME) trial.16 This small, randomized trial (total N = 42) concluded that at low-dose, the UFH inflammatory response was equivalent, as compared with high-dose UFH alone in PPI.16 There is a paucity of data on the use of combination eptifibatide and bivalirudin in the treatment of CLI. Therefore, this retrospective analysis was performed to assess the safety and feasibility of utilizing a combination of eptifibatide and bivalirudin, compared to a matched historical UFH control group in treating CLI with PPI.
1. Allie DE, Hebert CJ, Lirtzman MD, et al. A safety and feasibility report of combined direct thrombin and GP IIb/IIIa inhibition with bivalirudin and tirofiban in peripheral vascular disease intervention: Treating critical limb ischemia like acute coronary syndrome. J Invasive Cardiol 2005;17:427–432.
2. Allie DE, Hebert CJ, Lirtzman, MD, et al. Novel simultaneous combination chemical thrombolysis/rheolytic thrombectomy therapy for acute critical limb ischemia: The power-pulse spray technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:512–522.
3. Lincoff AM, Kleiman NS, Kattke-Marchant K, et al. Bivalirudin with planned or provisional abciximab during percutaneous coronary revascularization: Results of the Comparison of Abciximab Complications with Hirulog for Ischemic Events Trial (CACHET). Am Heart J 2002;143:846–853.
4. The ESPRIT Trial Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrilin blockade with eptifibatide in coronary stent intervention; The ESPRIT trial: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;285:2468–247.
5. The EPISTENT Investigators. Randomized placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. Evaluation of platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor for stenting. Lancet 1998;352:87–92.
6. Lincoff AM, Bittl JA, Harrington RA, et al. for the REPLACE-2 Investigators. Bivalirudin and provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned GP IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary angioplasty. JAMA 2003;289:853–863.
7. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-2002: Summary article. Circulation 2002;106:1893–1900.
8. Yost, ML. Peripheral arterial disease: A report by The Sage Group. 2004; Vol. II.
9. Allie DE, Hebert CJ, Walker CM. Disease management for critical limb ischemia (CLI). A discussion of CLI prognosis and diagnosis as well as revascularization strategies and more. In: CRYOPLASTY THERAPY: New Treatment Strategies for Infrainguinal Disease and Critical Limb Ischemia. HMP Communications, Malvern, Pennsylvania, 2006:9–14.
10. Best P, Lennon R, Ting H, et al. Even mild renal insufficiency is associated with increased mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:76A.
11. Robson R. The use of bivalirudin in patients with renal impairment. J Invasive Cardiol 2000;12(Suppl F):33F–36F.
12. Korn P, Hoenig SJ, Skillman JJ, et al. Is lower extremity revascularization worthwhile in patients with end stage renal disease? Surgery 2000;128:472–479.
13. Shammas NW, Lemke JH, Dippel EJ, et al. In-hospital complications of peripheral vascular interventions using unfractionated heparin as the primary anticoagulant. J Invasive Cardiol 2003;15:242–246.
14. Aguirre FV, Gill JB. Increasing benefit, reducing risk: Focusing of hemorrhagic complications in percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 2002;14:48B–54B.
15. Allie DE. Patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing percutaneous peripheral interventions are at increased risk for complications without adequate anticoagulation. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16(Suppl G):18G–21G.
16. Shammas NW, Dippel EJ, Lemke JH, et al. Eptifibatide in peripheral vascular interventions: Results of the Integrilin Reduces Inflammation in Peripheral Vascular Interventions (INFLAME) Trial. J Invasive Cardiol 2006;18:6–12.
17. Colwell JA. Treatment for the procoagulant state in type 2 diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2001:30:10011–10030.
18. Colwell JA. Antiplatelet agents for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2004;4:87–106.
19. Antithrombotic Trialists Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of myocardial infarction, and stroke in high-risk patients. Br Med J 2002;12:71–86.
20. Lincoff AM, Bittl JA, Harrington RA, et al. for the REPLACE-2 Investigators. Bivalirudin and provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned GP IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary angioplasty. JAMA 2003;289:853–863.
21. Marso SP, Lincoff M, Ellis SG, et al. Optimizing the percutaneous interventional outcomes for patients with diabetes mellitus. Results of the EPISTENT (Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for STENTing Trial) diabetic substudy. Circulation 1999;100:2477–2484.
22. Roffi M, Chew DP, Mukherjee D, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce mortality in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2001;104:2767–2771.
23. Theroux P, Alexander J, Pharand C, et al. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade improves outcomes in diabetic patients presenting with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Results from the Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and Symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) study. Circulation 2000;102:2466–2472.
24. Bhatt DL, Marso SP, Lincoff M, et al. Abciximab reduces mortality in diabetics following percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:922–928.
25. Wholey MH, Toursarkissian B, Postoak D, et al. Early experience in the application of distal protection devices in treatment of peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremities. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;64:227–235.
26. Suri R, Wholey MH, Postoak D, et al. Distal embolic protection during femoropopliteal atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:417–422.
27. Karnabatidis D, Katsanos K, Kagadis GC, et al. Distal embolism during percutaneous revascularization of infra-aortic arterial occlusive disease: An underestimated phenomenon. J Endovasc Ther 2006;3:269–280.
28. Allie DE, Hall P, Shammas NW, et al. The Angiomax Peripheral Procedure Registry of Vascular Events trial (APPROVE): In-hospital and 30-day results. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16:651–656.
29. Fisher RK, Harris PL. Epidemiological and economic considerations in the critically ischemic limb. Crit Limb Ischemia 1999:19–25.
30. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics. Ntl. Hosp. Discharge survey: Annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. Data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Series 13. 1983–2000.
31. Mayfield JA, Reiber GE, Maynard C, et al. Trends in lower limb amputation in Veterans Health Administration, 1989–1998. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37:23–30.
32. Allie DE, Hebert CJ, Lirtzman MD, et al. Critical limb ischemia: A global epidemic. A critical analysis of current treatment unmasks the clinical and economic costs of CLI. EuroInterv 2005;1:75–84.
33. Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD). J Vasc Surg 2000;31:S271.
34. Paaske WP, Lausten J. Femorodistal bypass grafting: Quality of life and socioeconomic aspects. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995;10:226–230.
35. Raviola CA, Nichter LS, Moore WS, et al. Costs of treating advanced leg ischemia. Bypass graft versus primary amputation. Arch Surg 1988;123:495–496.
36. Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD). J Vasc Surg 2000;31:1–296.
37. Wolfe, JHN. Defining the outcome of critical ischaemia: A one-year prospective study. Br J Surg 1986;11:153–157.
38. Pentacost MJ, Criqui MH, Dorros G, et al. Guidelines for peripheral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the abdominal aorta and lower extremity vessels. Circulation 1994;89:511–531.
39. Schillinger M, Exner M, Mlekusch W, et al. Inflammatory response to stent implantation: Differences in femoropopliteal, iliac and carotid arteries. Radiology 2002;224:529–535.
40. Shammas NW, Dippel EJ. Inflammation and cardiovascular risk: An overview. Int J Angiol 2004;13:161–167.
41. Liuzzo G, Buffon A, Biasucci LM, et al. Enhanced inflammatory response to coronary angioplasty in patients with severe unstable angina. Circulation 1998;98:2370–2376.
42. Schillinger M, Exner M, Mlekusch W, et al. Endovascular revascularization below the knee: 6-month results and predictive value of C-reactive protein level. Radiology 2003;227:419–425.
43. Li JJ, Fang CH, Jiang H, et al. Time course of inflammatory response after renal artery stenting in patients with atherosclerotic renal stenosis. Clin Chim Acta 2004;350:115–121.
44. Shammas N. An overview of antithrombins in peripheral vascular interventions. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16:440–443.
45. Kinnard TD, Stabile E, Mintz GS, et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:930–935.
46. Blankenship JC, Hellkamp AS, Aguirre FV, et al. Vascular access site complications after percutaneous coronary intervention with abciximab in the evaluation of c7E3 for the prevention of ischemic complications (EPIC) Trial. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:36–40.
47. The EPILOG Investigators. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1689–1696.
48. Rao SV, Jollis JG, Harrington RA, et al. Relationship of blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2004;292:1555–1562.
49. Shammas NW, Lemke JH, Dippel EJ, et al. Bivalirudin in peripheral vascular interventions: A single center experience. J Invasive Cardiol 2003;15:401–404.
50. Ross R. Atherosclerosis — An inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1999;340:115–126.
51. Grubbs G. Single center experience with bivalirudin anticoagulation in peripheral vascular interventions: Possible benefits over unfractionated heparin. Presented at Cardiovascular Revascularization Therapy Conference in Washington, D.C, January 26–29, 2003.
52. Ansel GM, George BS, Botti CF, et al. Use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet inhibitors in peripheral vascular interventions. Reviews Cardiovasc Med 2002;3(Suppl 1):S35–S40.
53. Allie DE, Hebert CJ, Walker CM, et al. Continuous tenecteplase infusion combined with peri/postprocedural platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in peripheral arterial thrombolysis: Initial safety and feasibility experience. J Endovasc Ther 2002;11:427–435.
54. Ansel GM, Silver MJ, Botti CF Jr, et al. Functional and clinical outcomes of nitinol stenting with and without abciximab for complex superficial femoral artery disease: A randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:288–297.
55. Rocha-Singh KJ, Trokey J. Combined glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition and low-dose fibrinolysis for peripheral arterial thrombosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;55:457–460.
56. Rocha-Singh KJ, Rutherford J. Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor inhibition with eptifibatide in percutaneous intervention for symptomatic peripheral vascular disease: The CIRCULATE pilot trial. Cathether Cardiovasc Interv 2005;66:470–473.











Post new comment