• LOGIN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • FREE E-Newsletter/Product Bulletins

Cath Lab Digest

  • Follow us on
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Privacy Policy/Copyright
    • About VDM
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archives
  • Editor's Update
  • Advertise
  • Reprints
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Portal
  • Reviewers
  • Contact

Search

A Single Center Clinical Evaluation of Carotid Stenting for the Treatment of Obstructive Carotid Artery Disease: Experience in a

  • Fri, 9/5/08 - 3:36pm
  • 1 Comments
  • 4216 reads
Author(s): 

Michael B. DeYoung, DO, Timothy Logan, DO, Julie Burnham, DO, Samer Kazziha, MD

Introduction
Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is a less invasive alternative to conventional carotid endarterectomy (CEA). CEA remains the mainstay for treatment of obstructive carotid artery disease (CAD) based on randomized trials conducted with low risk surgical patients compared with medical therapy.1 Results of the Study of Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) trial have concluded that CAS with an embolic protection device is not inferior to carotid endarterectomy in high risk patients and has been shown to have fewer complications in the short term.2 We report data on fifty consecutive cases utilizing a standardized carotid protocol at our institution performed by a single operator. The majority (96%) of procedures include embolic protection devices. We sought to demonstrate that carotid angioplasty and stenting can be accomplished safely and successfully in a community hospital with results comparable to those attained in clinical trials at academic centers.

Methods
Patient Population

Fifty consecutive cases were enrolled between October 20, 2001 and June 28, 2005 at Mount Clemens Regional Medical Center, Mount Clemens, Michigan. Consent was obtained at the time of enrollment. Patients were considered for CAS if one high-risk variable was present. These conditions included cervical immobility, contralateral carotid occlusion, high lesions, low or ostial lesions, prior neck radiation, prior radical neck surgery, short or obese neck, severe CAD/ angina, cardiomyopathy, severe aortic stenosis and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Symptomatic patients had a transient ischemic attack or stroke within the previous 120 days involving the ipsilateral carotid artery distribution. A symptomatic lesion had to be greater than 60% and an asymptomatic lesion had to be greater than 80% to be considered for CAS. All participants were greater than eighteen years old. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, stroke within four weeks of the index procedure, persisting ischemic stroke (defined as either a score >/- 15 on the NIH stroke scale, a Rankin score >/- 3 or a Barthel score

The average age of the patients was 71 (54–86). Thirty-one men (65%) and 17 women (35%) were enrolled in the study. Staged bilateral carotid interventions were completed in two patients. Therefore, there were 50 vessels which underwent CAS. Risk factors for carotid atherosclerosis and co-morbid conditions of the study group are listed in Table 1. Sixteen patients (32%) were symptomatic. Indications for CAS included prior CEA 14 patients (28%), 3 patients (6%) with contralateral carotid occlusion, 4 (8%) cases, which were considered to be low or ostial lesions, and one patient (2%) had a prior radical neck surgery. CAS was undertaken in the following high risk co-morbidities — severe CAD/angina defined as > 70% stenosis of 2 or more epicardial coronary arteries or significant (> 50%) left main disease (10 cases, 20%), cardiomyopathy with New York Heart Association Class III-IV symptoms (10 cases, 20%), severe aortic stenosis (1 case, 2%) and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3 cases, 6%). Two patients did not have high-risk features but refused traditional CEA and were allowed to enroll in the study.

Baseline color duplex ultrasound imaging was obtained in a laboratory accredited by the Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories (ICAVL). Carotid angiograms were obtained in all patients prior to (< 120 days) CAS. A neurological assessment was obtained by an independent, board certified neurologist prior to CAS. Baseline NIH, Barthel and Rankin stroke scales were completed. All patients were given aspirin 325 mg (unless an allergy was documented) prior to the procedure. Clopidogrel 75 mg was started 48 hours prior to the intervention and continued for four weeks post procedure or longer if indicated for cardiovascular indications. Ticlopidine (250 mg b.i.d.) was used in one patient with an allergy to clopidogrel.

Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Protocol
All carotid interventions were performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. All procedures were performed by a single interventional cardiologist. Frequent neurological examinations were performed during the procedures. Intravenous sedation was minimized. Antihypertensives were held the day of the procedure.
Anticoagulation was given during the procedure. Intravenous heparin was used in 37 cases (74%). The initial bolus dose of heparin was approximately 3,000 to 5,000 units (with necessary weight adjustments). Additional bolus doses of heparin were given to maintain an ACT near 300 seconds during the procedure. Bivalirudin was given in thirteen (26%) cases. Bivalirudin was administered utilizing standard doses for coronary interventional procedures.

References: 

1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–453.
2. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004;1493–1501.
3. Bush RL, Lin PH, Bianco CC, et al. Carotid artery stenting in a community setting: Experience outside of a clinical trial. Ann Vasc Surg 2003;17:629–634.
4. Eskandari MK, Longo GM, Matsumura JS, et al. Carotid stenting done exclusively by vascular surgeons. Ann Surg 2005;242:431–438.
5. Wholey MH. The ARCHeR trial: Prospective clinical trial for carotid stenting in high surgical risk patients, preliminary thirty-day results. Published abstract at American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Sessions, Chicago, Illinois, 2003.
6. Goodney PP, Schermerhorn ML, Powell RJ. Current status of carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2006;43:406–411.
7. Kastrup A, Groschel K, Schulz JB. Clinical predictors of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or death within 30 days of carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 2005;36:787.
8. Longo GM, Kibbe MR, Eskandari MK. Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: Is it too risky? Ann Vasc Surg 2005;19:812–816.
9. Stanziale SF, Marone LK, Boules TN, et al. Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians is associated with increased adverse outcomes. J Vasc Surg 2006;43:297–304.
10. Cayne NS, Faries PL, Trocciola SM, et al. Carotid angioplasty and stent-induced bradycardia and hypotension: Impact of prophylactic atropine administration and prior carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:956–961.
11. Groschel K, Ernemann U, Riecker A, et al. Incidence and risk factors for medical complications after carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:1101–1106.
12. Mlekusch W, Schillinger M, Sabeti S, et al. Hypotension and bradycardia after elective carotid stenting: Frequency and risk factors. J Endovasc Thera 2003;10:851–859.
13. Bosiers M, Peeters P, Deloose K, et al. Does carotid artery stenting work in the long run: 5-year results in high-volume centers (ELOCAS Registry). J Cardiovasc Surg 2005;46:241–247.
14. Bergeron P, Roux M, Khanoyan P, et al. Long-term results of carotid stenting are competitive with surgery. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:213–221.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • next ›
  • last »
image description image description
Malindasays: April 23.2011 at 15:46 pm

AKAIK you've got the aenswr in one!

Reply to this comment »

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

  • Advertise your Job Here
    For information on posting classified ads, please contact:
    Alex Dulnikowski, Classified Sales Manager
    (800) 237-7285, ext. 205

vdm Blogs

PROTECT carotid stent trial provides further evidence that CAS is getting better and becoming more competitive with CEA

Frank J Criado MD FACS FSVM

A New Algorithm to Treat Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease

Robert S. Dieter MD RVT and Aravinda Nanjundappa MD RVT

In-Stent Restenosis in the SFA Remains a Significant Unresolved Problem

Frank J Criado MD FACS FSVM

Support Comes From Many Directions

Richard R. Heuser MD FACC FACP FESC FSCAI

Pedal Artery Access: Advances in Management of Critical limb ischemia

Robert S. Dieter MD RVT and Aravinda Nanjundappa MD RVT
more »

Vascular Newswire

  • Medtronic Stent Resulted in 90% Freedom from Reinterventions in Narrowed Leg Arteries at 12 Months in International Study
    Thu, 02/09/12 - 10:52am
  • AngioDynamics Launches DuraFlow 2 Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter
    Wed, 02/08/12 - 10:18am
  • Robotic-Assisted Pci Procedures Using Corpath 200 System Will Be Discussed During CRT2012 Conference
    Tue, 02/07/12 - 10:00am
  • Vascular Solutions Launches Reprocessing Service For Closurefast Vein Catheters
    Fri, 02/03/12 - 1:14pm
more »

Clinical Events Calendar

  • American Venous Forum 24th Annual Meeting
    Wed, 02/08/2012 - Sat, 02/11/2012
    Orlando, FL, United States
  • JIM 2012
    Thu, 02/09/2012 - Sat, 02/11/2012
    Rome, Italy
  • Cardiovascular Care Update 2012 (CVC)
    Fri, 02/10/2012 - Sat, 02/11/2012
    Scottsdale, AZ, United States
more »

Poll

How do you feel about the continued practice of screening patients for asymptomatic CAD?:
REVIEW OUR OTHER Cardiology BRANDS

Our other resources for healthcare professionals.

HMP Communications © 2012 HMP Communications

HMP Communications LLC (HMP) is the authoritative source for comprehensive information and education servicing healthcare professionals. HMP’s products include peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed medical journals, national tradeshows and conferences, online programs and customized clinical programs. HMP is a wholly owned subsidiary of HMP Communications Holdings LLC. ©2012 HMP Communications