• LOGIN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • FREE E-Newsletter/Product Bulletins

Cath Lab Digest

  • Follow us on
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Privacy Policy/Copyright
    • About VDM
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archives
  • Editor's Update
  • Advertise
  • Reprints
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Portal
  • Reviewers
  • Contact

Search

A New Vascular Disease Sounding Board

  • Tue, 1/5/10 - 11:32am
  • 4206 reads
  • 1 comments

As we begin this new year, we also initiate a new “blog” from Vascular Disease Management. This blog should serve as a sounding board for many aspects of vascular disease, from medical management, intervention —both surgical or endovascular — to the new trends for therapy, with a keen eye towards an evidence-based measure for therapy — is the direction I want for this endeavor.

For the inaugural statement I wanted to direct my thoughts towards the ongoing discussions regarding vascular therapy. As we already know, the approach for most all vascular disease has shifted to an endovascular one with few exceptions. I believe this to be driven by the need to become less invasive for many, if not all, our patients and is a reasonable approach to this end. When Andreas Greuntzig performed the first angioplasty in 1977 and peripherally in 1978, one thought at the time — Was the need to “prove” this therapy beneficial in lieu of surgical or other “gold” standard approaches? This, however, has not happened in several anatomic locations despite the perceived and actual need for such. The enthusiasm for endovascular therapy and improved technical and catheter devices specifically made for the territory they treat have not driven a parallel robust industry in the scientific pursuits for much of what we do — renal and superficial femoral artery revascularization — as simple examples. Beyond several single-center experiences, many large-scale data in these territories have fallen short of the perceived benefits of the endovascular therapy.

My hope in the coming year, through governmental/payer pressure and investigator-sponsored investigation, is to begin to glean a better idea of what is best for our patients with vascular disease and their therapies, whether primarily medical or interventional. With this blog, I hope we can openly discuss the approaches we use to treat our patients with peripheral arterial disease and the best therapies for their benefit. This open discussion will, I hope, be civil and direct regarding the key questions we as investigators have. As the author, I do not support the idea that one person has all the answers, but should be the source of asking the appropriate questions, with the group providing the answers either by consensus or through scientific investigation.

Lawrence A. Garcia, MD

__________________________________

Dr. Garcia received his B.A. and M.D. degrees from the University of Arizona. He was an Intern and Resident at Parkland Memorial Hospital, University of Texas at Southwestern in Dallas, Texas. He received his training in Cardiology at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics in Iowa City, Iowa, and as an interventional cardiologist at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School. Further, he received his peripheral vascular training at St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Tuft’s University, Boston, Massachusetts. He then served as the Chief of Vascular Medicine and Peripheral Vascular Interventions for the Florida Heart Group in Orlando, Florida. Dr. Garcia returned to Harvard’s Beth Israel Hospital as a full-time interventional cardiologist and Director of the Peripheral Cardiovascular Program and Peripheral Interventions at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center as well as the Director of the Interventional Fellowship Program. This program developed into one of the busiest in the city of Boston, performing over 600 peripheral procedures per year.

Dr. Garcia has now returned to St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center as Chief of the Section of Interventional Cardiology and as Associate Director of the Vascular Medicine Program. Dr. Garcia’s work has largely focused on arterial occlusion-reperfusion models and the efficacy of therapeutic modalities or interventions with regard to free radical generation or endovascular stenting outcomes. Dr. Garcia continues his research interests in a wide variety of studies including acute MI studies, unstable angina studies, interventional trials, peripheral interventional trials, angiogenesis trials, imaging modality studies, and numerous device trials for both the coronary and peripheral circulations. His work has been presented in numerous manuscripts, abstracts, textbooks and textbook chapters.

image description image description
Opinions expressed by authors, contributors, and advertisers are their own and not necessarily those of HMP Communications, the editorial staff, or any member of the editorial advisory board. HMP Communications is not responsible for accuracy of dosages given in articles printed herein. The appearance of advertisements in this journal is not a warranty, endorsement or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. HMP Communications disclaims responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas or products referred to in the articles or advertisements.


Anonymoussays: April 28.2010 at 20:40 pm

I believe in the end we will realize that long SFA intervention both endo and open should be geared essentially for higher RC 4-6. Instead of trying to make the different permutations of stent, PTA, drug-PTA, atherectomy, prosthetic and vein as the single long standing intervention, we should prepare the vast majority for the realistic nature of recurrent disease and secondary interventions in the infrainguinal relm. When the interventional target is geared for RC 4-6 with medical/exercise therapy for RC 2-3, we will all be happier.
A JVS review found a marked discrepency between Interventional Cardiology and Vascular Surgery interventions for claudicants and wound patients with VS treating only 20% Claudicants and Cards treating 80%!!

Reply to this comment »

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

  • Advertise your Job Here
    For information on posting classified ads, please contact:
    Alex Dulnikowski, Classified Sales Manager
    (800) 237-7285, ext. 205

vdm Blogs

PROTECT carotid stent trial provides further evidence that CAS is getting better and becoming more competitive with CEA

Frank J Criado MD FACS FSVM

A New Algorithm to Treat Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease

Robert S. Dieter MD RVT and Aravinda Nanjundappa MD RVT

In-Stent Restenosis in the SFA Remains a Significant Unresolved Problem

Frank J Criado MD FACS FSVM

Support Comes From Many Directions

Richard R. Heuser MD FACC FACP FESC FSCAI

Pedal Artery Access: Advances in Management of Critical limb ischemia

Robert S. Dieter MD RVT and Aravinda Nanjundappa MD RVT
more »

Vascular Newswire

  • Boston Scientific Launches Innovative Crossing Device to Treat Complete Blockages in Peripheral Arteries
    Fri, 02/10/12 - 11:12am
  • Stereotaxis Announces European Adoption Milestone and Health Canada Market Clearance for Vdrive System
    Fri, 02/10/12 - 11:08am
  • Medtronic Stent Resulted in 90% Freedom from Reinterventions in Narrowed Leg Arteries at 12 Months in International Study
    Thu, 02/09/12 - 10:52am
  • AngioDynamics Launches DuraFlow 2 Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter
    Wed, 02/08/12 - 10:18am
more »

Clinical Events Calendar

  • American Venous Forum 24th Annual Meeting
    Wed, 02/08/2012 - Sat, 02/11/2012
    Orlando, FL, United States
  • JIM 2012
    Thu, 02/09/2012 - Sat, 02/11/2012
    Rome, Italy
  • Cardiovascular Care Update 2012 (CVC)
    Fri, 02/10/2012 - Sat, 02/11/2012
    Scottsdale, AZ, United States
more »

Poll

How do you feel about the continued practice of screening patients for asymptomatic CAD?:
REVIEW OUR OTHER Cardiology BRANDS

Our other resources for healthcare professionals.

HMP Communications © 2012 HMP Communications

HMP Communications LLC (HMP) is the authoritative source for comprehensive information and education servicing healthcare professionals. HMP’s products include peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed medical journals, national tradeshows and conferences, online programs and customized clinical programs. HMP is a wholly owned subsidiary of HMP Communications Holdings LLC. ©2012 HMP Communications