The Comorbidity of Peripheral Arterial Disease Attenuates Complications During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Wednesday, 07/31/13 | 11874 reads

Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar, MD, PhD1, Toshiro Shinke, MD, PhD1, Hiromasa Otake, MD, PhD1, Osama Rifaie, MD, FSCAI2, Mohammed Abdel-Rahman, MD2, Hazem Khorshid, MD2, Masayuki Nakagawa, MD1, Takumi Inoue, MD1, Hirotoshi Hariki, MD1, Junya Shite, MD, PhD1, Ken-ichi Hirata, MD, PhD1

Login toDownload PDF version

ABSTRACT: Background: In animal studies, chronic skeletal muscle ischemia induces myocardial remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC). We hypothesized that a history of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) might attenuate complications during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patents with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: Seventy-five STEMI patients (40 with PAD and 35 without PAD) were retrospectively studied. PAD was defined as ankle brachial index <0.9, or brachial ankle pulse wave velocity >1,800 cm/s. MI size and acute complications during PCI were compared. For patients without post-stenting coronary flow worsening, the difference between post-stenting and pre-stenting fluoroscopic frame count (∆FFC) was also compared. Results: Mean age was 68±12 years and 60 patients were males. Apart from greater age and more cases with hypertension in the PAD group, basic clinical and PCI data were similar. PAD patients had lower complications during PCI (20 vs 8, P=.001), lower peak CK-total (3,590±2,657 vs 2,035±1,353 IU/L, P=.003), and lower peak CK-MB (298±192 vs 185±129 IU/L, P=.021). For the 53 patients without coronary flow worsening, PAD patients had lower ∆FFC (-2.26±8.5, SE=1.94 vs -4.28±1.19, SE=2.20 frames, P=.035). Conclusion: Our observation study suggests that PAD attenuates complications during PCI and infarct size in patients with STEMI, probably by PAD-induced RIPC.  


Key words: myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, reperfusion injury


One of the concerns in the acute setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI).1 Recently, ischemic preconditioning (IPC) was shown to attenuate IRI if brief ischemic insult followed by reperfusion was introduced before the development of index myocardial ischemia.2,3 It is also found that myocardial infarction (MI) size can be reduced if a brief period of ischemia was applied to a distant organ before myocardial ischemia, an extension of IPC that was called remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC).4 Myocardial RIPC was found to occur after ischemia in a variety of remote tissues4,5 of which skeletal muscles attracted most interest, being accessible and manipulated without great clinical risk, and myocardial RIPC was shown to decrease MI size in animal studies.6,7 

Chronic skeletal muscle ischemia represents an exaggerated model of RIPC, which induces the formation of local collateral circulation.8,9 Animal studies have shown that chronic limb ischemia also induces coronary collateral circulation that was associated with smaller MI10,11 less inducible ventricular arrhythmia,12 and better coronary flow after MI.11

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is found in approximately 60% of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).13 PAD increases the long-term risk among patients with CAD and predicts worse outcomes of acute coronary syndrome.14

Recent studies found that the presence of PAD, indicated by low ABI15-17 or high brachial ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) values,18-20 might lead to the elevation of the circulating levels of some anti-inflammatory, vasodilator, or angiogenesis-inducing substances, raising questions about whether PAD-induced chronic skeletal muscle ischemia could be a source of RIPC.

Accordingly, the purpose of our study was to test the hypothesis that patients presenting with STEMI associated with the comorbidity of PAD, suggested by abnormal ABI or baPWV values, have less complications during primary PCI.


We retrospectively reviewed our hospital database for patients who underwent primary PCI because of acute STEMI between April 2005 and December 2011. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board on Biochemichal Research at Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan. Clinical, demographic, laboratory, and echocardiographic data, in addition to PCI reports and fluoroscopic runs, were reviewed from our local network server.

STEMI diagnosis was made if patients had ST elevation of 1 mm or more in 2 or more contagious leads associated with reciprocal ST-segment depression together with abnormally increasing cardiac enzymes.21 Patients were included if they had been tested for the presence of PAD by ABI and baPWV prior to STEMI-related admission or during their hospital stay.

Defining peripheral arterial disease

ABI and baPWV were measured using an automatic oscillometric device (Form PWV/ABI, BP-203RPE II, Omron Colin Co., Ltd.) as previously described.22,23 In our study, PAD was defined as ABI <0.924 or baPWV>1,800 cm/s25 on either or both limbs.

STEMI-related complications on presentation

Patients were classified to have complications on presentation if they presented with cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA), cardiogenic shock, or their occurrence before restoration of the culprit vessel flow (door-to-balloon window).

Acute PCI-related complications

Acute complications during PCI were defined as occurrence of any of the following: new intraprocedural hypotension, intraprocedural worsening of ST-segment elevation, any form of reperfusion arrhythmia occurring after restoration of the flow to the infarct area, or intraprocedural worsening of the coronary flow in the culprit vessel after stent implantation. 

Intraprocedural worsening of ST elevation was defined as ≥1 mm worsening of ST-segment elevation during PCI compared to admission ECG or any intraprocedural re-elevation of the ST-segment after PCI-induced partial or complete ST-segment resolution.

Assessment of intraprocedural coronary flow

Coronary flow was studied visually using thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow class after each step of PCI; namely, initial wiring of the culprit lesion, thrombus aspiration, pre-stenting balloon dilatations, stent deployment, and post-stenting balloon dilatations. Patients were considered to have coronary flow worsening if TIMI flow class decreased by ≥1 grade after stenting compared to an initially restored flow.

Coronary flow in patients without intraprocedural flow worsening

Coronary flow was further assessed by counting the fluoroscopic frames spanning the start and end of contrast injection as an indirect measure of coronary flow velocity (fluoroscopic frame count; FFC). It is worth noting that the frame rate of the fluoroscopic runs of all patients were the same (15 frames/second). FFC was counted in two preselected fluoroscopic runs; the first was the pre-stenting fluoroscopic run with the best TIMI flow (FFCpre) and the second was the fluoroscopic run taken just after stent deployment (FFCfinal). Frame counts were calculated from the frame at which contrast first encounters the ostium of the culprit vessel until the first frame where contrast reaches its most distal branch. Finally, ∆FFC was calculated as the difference between FFCfinal and FFCpre.

Infarct size assessment

Creatine kinase total (CK-total) and MB fraction (CK-MB) levels were measured serially every 6 hours. Values on presentation, 6 hours after presentation, and peak values were obtained to study the difference in serial changes between patients with or without PAD.

Infarct sizes were determined using peak CK-total and CK-MB. CK-total and CK-MB were measured as differences between peak values of CK-total and CK-MB and their values on presentation.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were represented as numbers and percentages and were compared using a χ2 test or Fisher exact test if the number of subjects in any cell was <5. Continuous variables were represented as mean ± standard deviation, were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and were compared using Student t test for independent variables if the variable followed a normal distribution, or Mann-Whitney U test if it did not follow a normal distribution. One-way ANOVA was used to examine the effect of PAD on serial enzyme measurements. Data were considered statistically significant if the P value was <.05. Comparisons were performed using SPSS software (Statistical Product and Services Solutions, version 16.0, SPSS Inc.).


Between April 2005 and December 2011, data from 380 patients with acute MI were available of whom 198 patients were STEMI. ABI and baPWV were available for 75 cases and accordingly they comprised the study group.

Classifying patients according to ABI and baPWV

Thirty-five patients had no PAD, and 40 patients were the study group with PAD. Among patients with PAD, 18 had ABI <0.9 (0.68±0.154) and 22 patients were classified as having PAD because of baPWV >1,800 cm/s (2,103±501 cm/s)

Basic clinical data

Table 1 summarizes basic admission and PCI data for both groups. Overall, the mean age was 67.64±11.98 years and 60 (80%) patients were males. Apart from significantly older patients and more patients with hypertension in the PAD group, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding sex, BMI, coronary risk factors, peak C-reactive protein, or ejection fraction on presentation. On pre-PCI coronary catheterization, both groups had no significant differences regarding number of diseased vessels, culprit lesion location, the proximity of culprit lesion, or lesion class according to the AHA classification (Table 1).

Acute STEMI-related complications

Complicated presentation related to STEMI, namely CPA, arrhythmia, or cardiogenic shock, occurred in 17 patients overall (8 without PAD and 9 with PAD) The occurrence of each complication or the occurrence of any of them was not different between groups (Table 2).

Reperfusion-related complications

Overall, 28 patients had one or more complications during PCI, a finding that occurred significantly less in patients with PAD (20 vs 8 patients, P=.004). PCI complications that occurred less in patients with PAD were new hypotension, reperfusion arrhythmia, and the development of post-stenting TIMI-flow worsening. Although fewer cases had worsening of ST elevation during PCI, this was not statistically significant (Table 2).

Comparisons of intraprocedural TIMI flow 

Figure 1 shows TIMI flow class before and after stenting for both study groups. The initially restored flow was TIMI class III in 60 patients (27 without PAD and 33 with PAD), TIMI class II in 13 patients (6 without PAD and 7 with PAD), and TIMI class I in 2 patients without PAD.

Intraprocedural TIMI-flow worsening occurred in 22 patients, and there was significantly different complication between groups; patients with PAD showed significantly fewer cases (16 vs 6 patients, P=.004, Table 2). After intracoronary nicorandil, 14 of these cases finished the procedure with TIMI class III flow, 3 cases finished the procedure with TIMI class II flow, and 4 finished with TIMI class I flow.

Composite of all acute complications

The composite of any acute complication (on presentation or during PCI) was significantly lower in patients with PAD (27 vs 11 patients, OR=0.172, 95% CI 0.064-0.466, and P<.0001) (Table 2).

Infarction size

CK-total and CK-MB serial measurements were available in 68 patients (32 without PAD and 36 with PAD), and 66 patients (31 without PAD and 35 with PAD), respectively. By Mann-Whitney U test, CK-total and CK-MB values on presentation were similar between groups. CK-total, and not CK-MB, became significantly lower in patients with PAD at 6 hours and was even more significantly lower, in addition to significantly lower CK-MB, when peak values were compared (Table 3). Moreover, patients with PAD showed significantly lower CK-total and CK-MB.

One-way ANOVA (Figure 2) suggested that the serial increase of CK-total was significantly lower in patients with PAD (P=.018), while there was a strong trend towards a lower serial increase in CK-MB (P=.069). Post-hoc analysis with Turkey test revealed that both enzymes were not significantly different on presentation and 6 hours after presentation in case of CK-total (P=1.00 and .17, respectively), and in the case of CK-MB (P=1.000 and 0.766, respectively). However, peak levels of CK-total and CK-MB were significantly lower in patients with PAD (P=.002 and .02, respectively). 

Comparisons for patients with low CK-total on presentation

It is expected that time from onset of pain to hospital presentation might bias the results concerning cardiac enzymes. Because data concerning the time to presentation was not available in this study, all comparisons regarding cardiac enzymes were redone in patients who presented to the hospital with low CK-total levels (<150 IU/L). 

Such comparisons confirmed the previously mentioned overall findings (Table 4), when we found that CK-total and CK-MB were similar at presentation; CK-total was significantly lower in patients with PAD at 6 hours and at peak levels, CK-MB was similar at 6 hours but peak levels were significantly lower in PAD patients, and both CK-total and CK-MB were significantly lower in patients with PAD.

Patients without intra-procedural flow worsening

For the 53 patients without post-stenting TIMI-flow worsening, there was no difference between both groups regarding fluoroscopic frame count at flow restoration (FFCpre). Interestingly, fluoroscopic frame count after stenting (FFCfinal) and the difference between FFCpre and FFCfinal (∆FFC) was significantly higher in patients without PAD (Table 5). 

Similar to the previous comparisons, cases with PAD in this subset of patients had a trend toward lower peak CK-total, and despite CK-MB levels were relatively lower in PAD patients, it lost the statistical significance. However, in this subset of patients, CK-total and CK-MB continued to be lower in patients with PAD (Table 5).


This observational study suggests that patients with STEMI associated with PAD have less acute complications on presentation or during PCI, smaller infarct size indicated by cardiac enzymes, and better coronary flow, indicated by less flow complications during PCI and by better fluoroscopic frame run after stenting. 

Skeletal muscle ischemia in different types of PAD

In our study, PAD-induced skeletal muscle ischemia seemed to contribute to the better short-term outcomes of STEMI in patients with PAD. The presence of PAD is reportedly a cause of skeletal muscle ischemia that result in claudication and decreased muscle mass. PAD can be occlusive or non occlusive. 

Occlusive PAD is characterized by arterial stenosis because of atherosclerotic plaques that develop chronically, leading eventually to a decrease in the cross-sectional arterial lumen area and thus decreasing blood supply to the skeletal muscles. Occlusive PAD can be diagnosed noninvasively by a low resting or exercise ABI. 

Nonocclusive PAD, on the other hand, is characterized by increased stiffness or calcification of the arterial wall which was also reported to cause claudication and skeletal muscle ischemia26-28 and can be identified noninvasively by abnormally high ABI or baPWV. Especially baPWV is considered a well known measure of arterial stiffness and reportedly predicts poor exercise tolerance and low VO2max that seems related to potential PAD25,29-31 and might be related to skeletal muscle ischemia.32 In our study, we included both types of PAD by studying patients who had ABI <0.9 as a marker of occlusive PAD, and baPWV >1,800 cm/s as markers of nonocclusive PAD.

PAD and coronary heart disease

The findings of this study go against the common consensus that PAD complicating coronary heart disease is a marker of poor prognosis and complications both after PCI and carotid artery bypass grafting. However, a recent study showed that in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, the coexistence of PAD was a predictor of poor prognosis only in the long term and not in the short term after surgery. The authors, however, did not describe the mechanism of such observation.33 

In a comment to that study, Ozeke et al, hypothesized that the mechanism behind this was the possibility of myocardial RIPC in patients with PAD.34 Thus, the findings of our study do not change the common belief of the long-term poor outcomes of patients with PAD if they suffer of coronary heart disease, but, shows that patients with PAD might have a paradoxical advantage during the acute stage of MI and during PCI, probably because the myocardium might be preconditioned chronically by the previously developed PAD. 

Effects of chronic limb ischemia in animal studies

RIPC was mostly tested based on the transient ischemia model. However, recently, animal studies have shown that chronic skeletal muscle ischemia induced coronary angiogenesis that cause myocardial preconditioning resulting in smaller infarcts, less inducible ventricular tachycardia and better coronary flow after AMI.10-12 

In our study, better ∆FFC and significantly lower cardiac enzymes noticed in patients with PAD, together with the significantly lower composite of all acute complications, seem to agree with these findings, however in humans.

Possible mechanisms

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the phenomenon of RIPC, such as suppression of inflammatory genes,4 modulation of ATP-sensitive K+ channels,5 nuclear factor κB p105, nitric oxide synthase,35 or free-radicals pathways.36 RIPC was also found to stimulate neovascularization in the ischemic myocardium by upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression that lead to limitation of infract size.37 Despite its promise in animal studies, the clinical benefit of RIPC in human studies remains controversial.38,39

It has been reported that patients with PAD and ABI <0.9 have an increased level of vascular endothelial growth factor angiopietin-2 and hypoxia-inducible growth factor-1 alpha leading to angiogenesis.15-17 Patients with high carotid-femoral PWV showed strong positive correlation with genetic expression of angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 which are also angiogenic.18 Moreover, increased baPWV was reported to be associated with increased levels of nitric oxide synthase20 and the anti-inflammatory acute phase reactant complement-1 inhibitor.19

Because all previously mentioned substances are circulating, it is reasonable to deduce that such tissue-protective or angiogenic substances might have an effect on the myocardium as well as cause RIPC. Accordingly, mechanisms related to RIPC seem to extend in chronic PAD of different causes explaining the better coronary flow and smaller MI in patients with PAD in our study.

Study Limitations

Unfortunately, this study suffered critical limitations: first, this is a retrospective analysis of a small number of patients. Second, because of being a retrospective study, and because ABI and baPWV are not routinely measured for patients with STEMI in our hospital, STEMI patients who did not have ABI/baPWV measured were excluded from the study. However, some of the patients excluded might have actually had PAD and thus excluding them might have biased the results of the study. Thus, for the aforementioned two reasons, a future prospective analysis using larger patient groups is recommended to verify the study findings. Third, our study included two different types of PAD, and although both types were shown in literature to cause skeletal muscle ischemia and claudication, future studies showed prospectively test our findings on each type of PAD separately. Fourth, TIMI-frame count (TFC) was introduced recently as an objective automated measure of coronary flow velocities. The TFC was not used in our study, again, because of being a retrospective analysis. Instead, we used the fluoroscopic frame count. However, fluoroscopic frame count used in our study can be affected by the speed of contrast injection and target vessel length. Because comparisons were made according to the differences in FFCpre and FFCfinal, we feel that these limitations have minimally affected our results, because they were measured in the same vessel and injections were always done by the same operator. Finally, substances suggested to be responsible for RIPC were not measured in our study. Further studies should take these measurements into concern.


In this observational study it is suggested that the comorbidity of PAD attenuates acute complications of primary PCI in patients with STEMI, probably because of RIPC that might occur in association with or as a contribution to better coronary collateral circulation.

Editor’s Note: Disclosure: The authors have completed and returned the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. The authors report no conflicts of interest related to the content of this manuscript.

Manuscript received March 20, 2013; provisional acceptance given April 8, 2013; final version accepted May 6, 2013.

Address for correspondence: Toshiro Shinke, MD, PhD, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 6500017, Japan. Email:



  1. Carden DL, Granger DN. Pathophysiology of ischaemia-reperfusion injury. J Pathol. 2000;190(3):255-266.
  2. Liu Y, Downey JM. Ischemic preconditioning protects against infarction in rat heart. Am J Physiol. 1992;263(4 Pt 2):H1107-1112.
  3. Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: A delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation. 1986;74(5):1124-1136.
  4. Gho BC, Schoemaker RG, van den Doel MA, Duncker DJ, Verdouw PD. Myocardial protection by brief ischemia in noncardiac tissue. Circulation. 1996;94(9):2193-2200. 
  5. Verdouw PD, Gho BC, Koning MM, Schoemaker RG, Duncker DJ. Cardioprotection by ischemic and nonischemic myocardial stress and ischemia in remote organs. Implications for the concept of ischemic preconditioning. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1996;793:27-42.
  6. Chen YS, Chien CT, Ma MC, et al. Protection “outside the box” (skeletal remote preconditioning) in rat model is triggered by free radical pathway. J Surg Res. 2005;126(1):92-101. 
  7. Kharbanda RK, Mortensen UM, White PA, et al. Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo. Circulation. 2002;106(23):2881-2883. 
  8. Garcia LA. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13 Suppl 2:II3-II9. 
  9. Ouriel K. Peripheral arterial disease. Lancet. 2001;358(9289):1257-1264. 
  10. Varnavas VC, Paraskevas KI, Iliodromitis EK, et al. Chronic hind limb ischemia reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in the rabbit heart by promoting coronary angiogenesis/arteriogenesis. In Vivo. 24(2):147-152. 
  11. Varnavas VC, Kontaras K, Glava C, et al. Chronic skeletal muscle ischemia preserves coronary flow in the ischemic rat heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 301(4):H1229-H1235.
  12. Maniotis C, Tsalikakis DG, Tzallas AT, et al. Chronic skeletal muscle ischemia in rats decreases the inducibility of ventricular tachyarrhythmias after myocardial infarction. In Vivo. 25(5):781-786. 
  13. Hertzer NR, Beven EG, Young JR, et al. Coronary artery disease in peripheral vascular patients. A classification of 1000 coronary angiograms and results of surgical management. Ann Surg. 1984;199(2):223-233. 
  14. Bhatt DL, Peterson ED, Harrington RA, et al. Prior polyvascular disease: Risk factor for adverse ischaemic outcomes in acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(10):1195-1202. 
  15. Blann AD, Belgore FM, McCollum CN, Silverman S, Lip PL, Lip GY. Vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, Flt-1, in the plasma of patients with coronary or peripheral atherosclerosis, or Type II diabetes. Clin Sci (Lond). 2002;102(2):187-194. 
  16. Makin AJ, Chung NA, Silverman SH, Lip GY. Vascular endothelial growth factor and tissue factor in patients with established peripheral artery disease: A link between angiogenesis and thrombogenesis? Clin Sci (Lond). 2003;104(4):397-404. 
  17. Findley CM, Mitchell RG, Duscha BD, Annex BH, Kontos CD. Plasma levels of soluble tie2 and vascular endothelial growth factor distinguish critical limb ischemia from intermittent claudication in patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(5):387-393. 
  18. Marketou ME, Kontaraki JE, Tsakountakis NA, et al. Arterial stiffness in hypertensives in relation to expression of angiopoietin-1 and 2 genes in peripheral monocytes. J Hum Hypertens. 24(5):306-311. 
  19. Chae YM, Park JK. The relationship between brachial ankle pulse wave velocity and complement 1 inhibitor. J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24(5):831-836. 
  20. Ferrini MG, Davila HH, Valente EG, Gonzalez-Cadavid NF, Rajfer J. Aging-related induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase is vasculo-protective to the arterial media. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;61(4):796-805. 
  21. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(3):E1-E211. 
  22. Yamashina A, Tomiyama H, Takeda K, et al. Validity, reproducibility, and clinical significance of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement. Hypertens Res. 2002;25(3):359-364. 
  23. Tomiyama H, Koji Y, Yambe M, et al. Elevated c-reactive protein augments increased arterial stiffness in subjects with the metabolic syndrome. Hypertension. 2005;45(5):997-1003. 
  24. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation. 2006;113(11):e463-e654. 
  25. Xu Y, Wu Y, Li J, et al. The predictive value of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in coronary atherosclerosis and peripheral artery diseases in urban Chinese patients. Hypertens Res. 2008;31(6):1079-1085. 
  26. Aboyans V, Ho E, Denenberg JO, Ho LA, Natarajan L, Criqui MH. The association between elevated ankle systolic pressures and peripheral occlusive arterial disease in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(5):1197-1203. 
  27. Suominen V, Rantanen T, Venermo M, Saarinen J, Salenius J. Prevalence and risk factors of PAD among patients with elevated ABI. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35(6):709-714. 
  28. Stein R, Hriljac I, Halperin JL, Gustavson SM, Teodorescu V, Olin JW. Limitation of the resting ankle-brachial index in symptomatic patients with peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Med. 2006;11(1):29-33. 
  29. Amoh-Tonto CA, Malik AR, Kondragunta V, Ali Z, Kullo IJ. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity is associated with walking distance in patients referred for peripheral arterial disease evaluation. Atherosclerosis. 2009;206(1):173-178. 
  30. Khandanpour N, Armon MP, Jennings B, Clark A, Meyer FJ. The association between ankle brachial pressure index and pulse wave velocity: Clinical implication of pulse wave velocity. Angiology. 2009;60(6):732-738. 
  31. Vaitkevicius PV, Fleg JL, Engel JH, et al. Effects of age and aerobic capacity on arterial stiffness in healthy adults. Circulation. 1993;88(4 Pt 1):1456-1462. 
  32. Davies JI, Struthers AD. Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: A critical review of their strengths and weaknesses. J Hypertens. 2003;21(3):463-472. 
  33. Van Straten AH, Firanescu C, Soliman Hamad MA, et al. Peripheral vascular disease as a predictor of survival after coronary artery bypass grafting: Comparison with a matched general population. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(2):414-420. 
  34. Ozeke O, Gungor M, Ozer C. Is remote ischemic preconditioning triggered by intermittent claudication secondary to peripheral arterial disease responsible for preventing early mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery? Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91(1):333-334. 
  35. Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Preconditioning and postconditioning: Underlying mechanisms and clinical application. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204(2):334-341. 
  36. Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat Med. 2003;9(6):653-660. 
  37. Kawata H, Yoshida K, Kawamoto A, et al. Ischemic preconditioning upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor mrna expression and neovascularization via nuclear translocation of protein kinase c epsilon in the rat ischemic myocardium. Circ Res. 2001;88(7):696-704. 
  38. Perrault LP, Menasche P, Bel A, et al. Ischemic preconditioning in cardiac surgery: A word of caution. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112(5):1378-1386. 
  39. Kaukoranta PK, Lepojarvi MP, Ylitalo KV, Kiviluoma KT, Peuhkurinen KJ. Normothermic retrograde blood cardioplegia with or without preceding ischemic preconditioning. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63(5):1268-1274.

From the 1Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kobe, Japan, and 2 Ain Shams University, Department of Cardiology, Cairo, Egypt.



Original Research

Add new comment

Back to top