• LOGIN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • FREE E-Newsletter/Product Bulletins

Cath Lab Digest

  • Follow us on
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Privacy Policy/Copyright
    • About VDM
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archives
  • Editor's Update
  • Advertise
  • Reprints
  • Authors
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Portal
  • Reviewers
  • Contact

Search

EVAR Surveillance in 2010

  • Sat, 6/12/10 - 9:40am
  • 2441 reads
  • 1 comments

I am returning now from the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Meeting in Boston. I was honored to be asked to co-moderate one of the post-graduate courses offered by the SVS the day before the meeting. Ten endovascular experts, with a special interest in EVAR, spoke about surveillance, endoleaks and late failure management.

One point is very clear to me: we have made a tremendous amount of progress since Dr. Parodi’s initial EVAR report in 1990, but on the other hand, we still have not even come close to reaching a consensus about EVAR follow-up. CTA? Ultrasound? Pressure sensors? Treat type II leaks? Don’t treat type II leaks? Etc…

It was clear to me that everyone in the audience, by a show of hands, felt that surveillance (lifelong) was necessary. Many people used CTA imaging. Others used ultrasound. Very few people in this group used pressure sensors. Some used a combination of imaging modalities. So…twenty years later, we still are unsure of how to safely follow our patients after EVAR.

The same issue is true for endoleaks. There seemed to be a consensus about treating type II leaks with aneurysm sac expansion. But many people sent these patients to another physician to treat the problem. Most people did not think we needed to treat type II endoleaks with a stable or shrinking aneurysm sac. But there was some discussion about treating type II leaks identified at the time of endograft insertion. There was also a discussion regarding pre-emptive embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery to prevent type II endoleaks. So…twenty years later, we still are unsure of how and when to treat endoleaks.

Late failures are becoming a bigger issue now that FDA-approved devices have been available for over a decade. Migration, fatigue, fractures. These issues are becoming a concern. Endovascular management can be useful, but open options need to be entertained. We are still learning how to deal with these issues.

I was awed by how much we still have to learn. Devices are improving and new trials are coming soon. It is clear to me that we can better define how to perform surveillance, treat endoleaks and manage late endograft failures.

_____________________________________________________________________

Ross Milner, MD, FACS is associate professor of surgery at Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine. He was recruited to Loyola from Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, where he was associate professor of surgery.

Dr. Milner graduated Cum Laude from the University of Pennsylvania, where he also completed medical school. He was chief resident in surgery at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. He completed fellowships at the University of Pennsylvania and University Medical Center in Utrecht in the Netherlands. Dr. Milner is currently Chief of the Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy at Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois.

image description image description
Opinions expressed by authors, contributors, and advertisers are their own and not necessarily those of HMP Communications, the editorial staff, or any member of the editorial advisory board. HMP Communications is not responsible for accuracy of dosages given in articles printed herein. The appearance of advertisements in this journal is not a warranty, endorsement or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. HMP Communications disclaims responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas or products referred to in the articles or advertisements.


Jaylonsays: April 23.2011 at 17:49 pm

HHIS I should have tohguht of that!

Reply to this comment »

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

  • Advertise your Job Here
    For information on posting classified ads, please contact:
    Alex Dulnikowski, Classified Sales Manager
    (800) 237-7285, ext. 205

vdm Blogs

PROTECT carotid stent trial provides further evidence that CAS is getting better and becoming more competitive with CEA

Frank J Criado MD FACS FSVM

A New Algorithm to Treat Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease

Robert S. Dieter MD RVT and Aravinda Nanjundappa MD RVT

In-Stent Restenosis in the SFA Remains a Significant Unresolved Problem

Frank J Criado MD FACS FSVM

Support Comes From Many Directions

Richard R. Heuser MD FACC FACP FESC FSCAI

Pedal Artery Access: Advances in Management of Critical limb ischemia

Robert S. Dieter MD RVT and Aravinda Nanjundappa MD RVT
more »

Vascular Newswire

  • Medtronic Stent Resulted in 90% Freedom from Reinterventions in Narrowed Leg Arteries at 12 Months in International Study
    Thu, 02/09/12 - 10:52am
  • AngioDynamics Launches DuraFlow 2 Chronic Hemodialysis Catheter
    Wed, 02/08/12 - 10:18am
  • Robotic-Assisted Pci Procedures Using Corpath 200 System Will Be Discussed During CRT2012 Conference
    Tue, 02/07/12 - 10:00am
  • Vascular Solutions Launches Reprocessing Service For Closurefast Vein Catheters
    Fri, 02/03/12 - 1:14pm
more »

Clinical Events Calendar

  • American Venous Forum 24th Annual Meeting
    Wed, 02/08/2012 - Sat, 02/11/2012
    Orlando, FL, United States
  • JIM 2012
    Thu, 02/09/2012 - Sat, 02/11/2012
    Rome, Italy
  • Cardiovascular Care Update 2012 (CVC)
    Fri, 02/10/2012 - Sat, 02/11/2012
    Scottsdale, AZ, United States
more »

Poll

How do you feel about the continued practice of screening patients for asymptomatic CAD?:
REVIEW OUR OTHER Cardiology BRANDS

Our other resources for healthcare professionals.

HMP Communications © 2012 HMP Communications

HMP Communications LLC (HMP) is the authoritative source for comprehensive information and education servicing healthcare professionals. HMP’s products include peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed medical journals, national tradeshows and conferences, online programs and customized clinical programs. HMP is a wholly owned subsidiary of HMP Communications Holdings LLC. ©2012 HMP Communications