• LOGIN
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • FREE E-Newsletter/Product Bulletins

Cath Lab Digest

  • Follow us on
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Privacy Policy/Copyright
    • About VDM
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archives
  • Multimedia
  • Editor's Update
  • Advertise
  • Reprints
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Author Instructions
    • Submission Portal
    • Reviewers

Search

Long-term results with bare-metal LifeStent in the SFA: Is this bad news for DES technologies?

  • Mon, 4/9/12 - 11:43am
  • 2208 reads
  • 0 comments

Co-Principal Investigator Laird et al recently published the 3-year follow-up data from the RESILIENT randomized trial.1 This clinical study evaluated the long-term outcomes of primary nitinol stenting with the LifeStent self-expanding nitinol stent (Bard Peripheral Vascular) for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions up to 15 cm in length, as these stents were found to have superior short-term patency compared with balloon angioplasty alone.

The RESILIENT trial randomized 206 patients (143 men; mean age: 67) with intermittent claudication due to superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery lesions in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with nitinol stents or balloon angioplasty at 24 centers in the United States and Europe. The patients were followed for 3 years. During that time, 15 patients died, 20 withdrew consent, and 10 were lost to follow-up, leaving 161 patients (78.2%) available for a 36-month assessment. The RESILIENT investigators reported that the 12-month freedom from target lesion revascularization rate was 87.3% for the stent group versus 45.2% for the angioplasty group (P<0.0001). At 3 years, there was no difference in survival (90% vs. 91.7%; P=0.71) or freedom from major adverse events (75.2% vs. 75.2%; P=0.98) between the stent and angioplasty groups. Duplex ultrasound was not mandated after the first year, so stent patency could not be ascertained beyond 1 year. However, freedom from target lesion revascularization at 3 years was significantly higher in the stent group (75.5% vs 41.8%; P<0.0001), as was clinical success (63.2% vs 17.9%; P<0.0001). At 18 months, there was a 4.1% (12/291) stent fracture rate.

These results are clearly excellent, and make me wonder how one could intellectually or economically justify the use of drug-eluting stents for the same indications?

References

  1. Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, et al; for the RESILIENT Investigators. Nitinol stent implantation vs. balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries of patients with claudication: three-year follow-up from the RESILIENT randomized trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19(1):1-9.
Bookmark/Search this post with
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Linkedin Share Button
  • Tweet Widget
Find more blogs image description image description
Opinions expressed by authors, contributors, and advertisers are their own and not necessarily those of HMP Communications, the editorial staff, or any member of the editorial advisory board. HMP Communications is not responsible for accuracy of dosages given in articles printed herein. The appearance of advertisements in this journal is not a warranty, endorsement or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. HMP Communications disclaims responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas or products referred to in the articles or advertisements.


Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
  • Advertise your Job Here
    For information on posting classified ads, please contact:
    Kimberly Sutkowski, Classified Sales Representative
    (800) 237-7285, ext. 205

Vascular Access: The VDM Clinician Blog

Anticoagulant Treatment of DVT and Preventing DVT-PE Made Easier

Frank J Criado MD FACS FSVM

Retrograde Crossing: When the Front Door Is Locked, Look for Another Way In!

Ajay U. Mhatre MD

Collecting More Data for Vascular Patients

Lawrence A. Garcia MD

A Road Less Traveled: Access in the Right Brachial Artery

Ajay U. Mhatre MD

Endovascular Options for Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Robert S. Dieter MD RVT and Aravinda Nanjundappa MD RVT
more »

Vascular Newswire

  • Elixir Medical Receives CE Mark Approval for the Fully Bioresorbable DESolve Novolimus Eluting Coronary Scaffold System
    Wed, 05/15/13 - 10:12am
  • Reverse Medical Corporation Announces CE Mark and Initial Clinical Experience with the MVP Micro Vascular Plug for Peripheral Embolization
    Wed, 05/15/13 - 8:55am
  • St. Jude Medical Announces First Patient Enrollment in EnligHTN III Renal Denervation Study of Next-Generation EnligHTN System
    Wed, 05/15/13 - 8:52am
  • Decades of Improving Cholesterol Levels Abruptly Ended in 2008, PLOS ONE Study Finds
    Tue, 05/14/13 - 10:02am
more »

Clinical Events Calendar

  • EuroPCR 2013
    Tue, 05/21/2013 - Fri, 05/24/2013
    Paris, France
  • European Society for Vascular Surgery European Vascular Trauma Workshop
    Mon, 05/27/2013 - Tue, 05/28/2013
    Sweden
  • Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Annual Meeting 2013 (SVS)
    Thu, 05/30/2013 - Sat, 06/01/2013
    San Francisco, CA, United States
more »

Poll

Drug-eluting balloons will have a major role in lower-extremity revascularization in the future.:
REVIEW OUR OTHER Cardiology BRANDS

Our other resources for healthcare professionals.

HMP Communications © 2013 HMP Communications

HMP Communications LLC (HMP) is the authoritative source for comprehensive information and education servicing healthcare professionals. HMP’s products include peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed medical journals, national tradeshows and conferences, online programs and customized clinical programs. HMP is a wholly owned subsidiary of HMP Communications Holdings LLC. ©2013 HMP Communications